Tennis Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis <span id="more-11609"></span>Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anybody of match repairing at Wimbledon, but many say that the practice is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis was faced with accusations of match fixing for years: from the infamous match between Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much for the public to questions concerning the integrity of matches in certain smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, here always appears to be something lurking underneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired once more this in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and figure out just how much of a problem match fixing is for the sport week.

One 2014 study cited in that tale estimated that one percent of all of the first-round tournament matches might be fixed, which would mean more than 20 matches a year were affected by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have actually suggested that numerous matches per week could be fixed, though that’s nevertheless a very small percentage of all expert tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

Why is tennis therefore vulnerable to match fixing?

There are a mix of factors, lots of which help explain why the issue seems most prominent at the lower levels regarding the expert ranks.

First, there’s the obvious reality that tennis (at least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.

There is certainly only someone that needs to be bribed to get them to throw a match (equivalent issue that leads many to fear widespread integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick up the slack for the player who is struggling.

Having said that, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For one, there is the actual fact why these matches have a powerful amount of scrutiny on them; perhaps even more importantly, though, star tennis players are excessively well paid, meaning it would price anyone attempting to fix a match at that level an excessive quantity of cash, if maybe it’s done at all.

That is not to say that nobody attempts. Also Novak Djokovic has told a tale to be offered $100,000 to fix a match back in 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors are not making nearly that much money, and might even lose cash in a given tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken into account.

That produces them prime targets for gamblers looking to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result

Another problem is the very fact that gamblers don’t also have to fix a match that is entire find ways to profit.

Because numerous gambling web sites and bookmakers provide wagering on sets or games that are even individual players can reach agreements to allow certain activities to take place during the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular typical fix would be to divide the first two sets up to a predetermined script, then have fun with the third set fairly to determine which player progresses,’ recreations modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this 12 months.

The Tennis Integrity Unit is the physical body tasked with rooting out such issues, and they have actually sometimes made examples of players. Each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though not for match-fixing in March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, its not likely in order to alter the culture that enables lower-ranked players to be incentivized to assist gamblers who want to make sure bets.

That would need a complete change in how compensation works up and down the different levels of expert tennis, a thing that probably will not happen any moment soon.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Present nj-new Jersey DDoS attacks on unnamed regulated web sites had been with a ransom note future that is promising much more serious attacks should companies maybe not comply. (Image:

DDoS (distributed denial of service) is not a reality that any gaming that is online ever would like to cope with, but some regulated brand New Jersey sites had to do just that last week.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the very first time, by these distributed attacks.

Late final week, at least four unnamed web sites were derailed by a planet 7 oz contact hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately taking them offline for around half an hour.

The attacks had been followed by a ransom note for a sum that is undisclosed payable in Bitcoin, with a danger of a far more severe attack to follow.

Not New, But Frustrating

DDoS attacks are nothing new for the gambling that is online, of program. In fact, they’re as old as the industry itself, but there are suggestions that incidents for the unwelcome actions have been growing. Some experts even claim that assaults across all industries that are online doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators regarding the receiving end last year included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National day, the UK horse race that is biggest meet of the year when it comes to betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large events that are sporting the hope that operators will simply pay up rather than lose company. PokerStars, Unibet, and Swedish state gambling monopoly Svenska Spel are also all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Inspite of the interruption that is initial it appears that the problem is currently stable and it has been effectively dealt with by the nj-new Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites while the hackers is certainly one of cat and mouse, of strategy and counterstrategy: as safety technology improves, therefore do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this that the matter was now being investigated by state police, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, as well as his own organization week. The various agencies, he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ that has ‘done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, nevertheless. To date, only two men have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles whom made the blunder of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet him in a resort space. The operator, of program, brought law enforcement with him. In 2013, the pair that is hapless sentenced to 5 years in prison by way of a court in great britain.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, needless to say. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, had been subjected to a massive cyber attack that was believed to have emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers began flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard disks were wiped clean as malware ripped through the company’s networks.

As hackers started compressing and downloading batches of delicate files, comprising every thing from high-roller credit checks to information on international computer systems, the decision had been taken up to sever the multibillion dollar operation entirely from the Internet.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million well worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been inspired after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the bidder that is sole the fourth NY casino permit, proposes an improved expansion package having failed to impress last December. (Image:

Regulators in nyc State have slim pickings if they come to decide on the winner associated with the 4th Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposal for Monday’s due date, while a rival pulled down at the final moment.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols could be the one and only applicant for the area, with a $195 million expansion proposal to its present center.

The aborted proposition, from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project would have been ‘seismic,’ that might have been what the ecological everyone was complaining about in the place that is first specially when you consider it has an ongoing debate about fracking within the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, didn’t impress the Gaming Control Board at the original licensing hearing with their project in December 2014, although he has since come up having an improved package.

Back then, the board recommended three casino licenses, for Monticello, in the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs entirely, despite having been issued the powers to suggest a fourth license.

Gural was furious at the decision and highly critical of the board. He argued that the casino in the Southern Tier would be completely rational, because the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

‘It’s got nothing to accomplish I have enough money,’ he fumed with me. ‘But the individuals of the Southern Tier?’

‘And what really pisses me off,’ he continued, warming to their theme, ‘is the governor asked me personally to spend $800,000 of my cash to pass Local legislation 1, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the thing that is whole sickening to tell the truth with you.’


Such ended up being the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

‘As this is the license that is last in New York State, it would likely excite national competition by interested parties that distribute better yet applications than 1st round,’ suggested Cuomo. ‘ in the event that you agree to the request, the [casino board] should quickly establish a procedure for the license that is fourth could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it would likely now regret, as it finds itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political stress to honor a license to a man who’s also been highly critical of its decision making processes.