Tennis Match Fixing Problems Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis <span id="more-11579"></span>Match Fixing Problems Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anyone of match fixing at Wimbledon, but many say that the practice is extensive among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis is up against accusations of match fixing for years: through the infamous match between Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of the public to questions about the integrity of matches in some smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, here always generally seems to be something lurking beneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired again this week in a story by The Daily Beast, which again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and determine the amount of of a challenge match fixing is for the game.

One 2014 study cited in that story estimated that one percent of most tournament that is first-round might be fixed, which may mean more than 20 matches a year were affected by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have suggested that numerous matches each week could be fixed, though that’s still an extremely tiny percentage of all expert tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

What makes tennis therefore vulnerable to match fixing?

There are always a combination of factors, lots of which help explain why the problem seems most prominent during the lower levels associated with the ranks that are professional.

First, there’s the obvious fact that tennis (at least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.

There was only one person that should be bribed in order to get them to throw a match (the same issue that leads many to fear widespread integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick up the slack for the player whom is struggling.

Having said that, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For just one, there is the very fact why these matches have a powerful quantity of scrutiny if it could be done at all on them; perhaps even more importantly, though, star tennis players are extremely well compensated, meaning it would cost anyone attempting to fix a match at that level an exorbitant amount of money.

That’s not to say that planet oz 7 login nobody attempts. Also Novak Djokovic has told an account of being offered $100,000 to repair a match back in 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and may even lose cash in a given tournament after travel and mentoring expenses are taken into consideration.

That makes them prime targets for gamblers trying to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Repairing Without Impacting Match Result

Another problem is the actual fact that gamblers don’t also have to fix a match that is entire find techniques to benefit.

Because numerous gambling internet sites and bookmakers offer betting on sets or also individual games, players can reach agreements to permit certain activities to occur at the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular fix that is common be to divide the very first two sets to a predetermined script, then play the 3rd set fairly to determine which player advances,’ sports modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.

The Tennis Integrity product could be the physical body tasked with rooting out such issues, and they have actually sometimes made examples of players. Each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though not for match-fixing in March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is not likely in order to alter the culture that enables lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who want to make bets that are sure.

That would require a change that is complete how compensation works up and down the various amounts of professional tennis, something that probably will not take place any moment soon.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Web Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Present New Jersey DDoS assaults on unnamed regulated sites had been with a ransom note promising future, more severe assaults should businesses not comply. (Image:

DDoS (distributed denial of service) isn’t truth that any gaming that is online ever wants to cope with, but some regulated New Jersey sites had to do just that last week.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the first-time, by these distributed attacks.

Late week that is last at minimum four unnamed web sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately taking them offline for around half an hour.

The attacks were followed closely by a ransom note for an undisclosed amount, payable in Bitcoin, with a threat of a far more severe attack to follow.

Not New, But Irritating

DDoS attacks are nothing brand new for the online gambling industry, of program. In fact, they’re as old as the industry it self, but there are suggestions that incidents regarding the unwanted actions have actually been growing. Some experts even claim that assaults across all online industries really doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators on the receiving end a year ago included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National day, the biggest UK horse race meet of this year with regards to betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large sporting events in the hope that operators only will pay up rather than lose business. PokerStars, Unibet, and Swedish state gambling monopoly Svenska Spel may also be all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Despite the interruption that is initial it appears that the problem has become stable and contains been effortlessly dealt with by the New Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites while the hackers is certainly one of pet and mouse, of strategy and counterstrategy: as security technology improves, therefore do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this week that the problem was now being investigated by state authorities, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, in addition to their own organization. The agencies that are various he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ who had ‘done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, however. Up to now, only two guys have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles whom made the mistake of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet him in a resort room. The operator, of program, brought the police with him. In 2013, the hapless set were sentenced to 5 years in prison with a court in the UK.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, needless to say. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, ended up being put through a massive cyber assault that had been believed to have emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers started flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard disk drives were wiped clean as malware ripped through the organization’s networks.

The decision was taken to sever the multibillion dollar operation completely from the Internet as hackers began compressing and downloading batches of sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to details of global computer systems.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been prompted after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the single bidder for the fourth NY casino permit, proposes an improved expansion package having failed to impress last December. (Image:

Regulators in New York State have slim pickings if they come to decide in the winner of the fourth Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposal for Monday’s due date, while a rival pulled out at the minute that is last.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols is the one and only applicant for the certain area, by having a $195 million expansion proposal to its current facility.

The aborted proposition, from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project would have been ‘seismic,’ that might have been what the environmental individuals were complaining about in the first place, especially when you consider it has an ongoing debate about fracking into the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, did not wow the Gaming Control Board at the initial certification hearing with his task in December 2014, although he has since come up with an improved package.

In those days, the board suggested three casino licenses, for Monticello, in the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs totally, despite having been granted the powers to suggest a license that is fourth.

Gural was furious during the decision and extremely critical of the board. He argued that the casino in the Southern Tier would be perfectly rational, as the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

‘It’s got nothing to do I have enough money,’ he fumed with me. ‘but the social individuals of the Southern Tier?’

‘And what really pisses me down,’ he continued, warming to their theme, ‘is the governor asked me personally to spend $800,000 of my money to pass law that is local, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the thing that is whole sickening in all honesty with you.’


Such had been the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

‘As this will be the license that is last in New York State, it would likely excite national competition by interested parties that submit even better applications than the first round,’ suggested Cuomo. ‘ If you agree to this request, the [casino board] should quickly establish a process for the license that is fourth could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it might now be sorry for, as it finds itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political stress to award a license to a man who has already been highly critical of its decision making processes.